[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issue 4039

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 17:20:45 +0400

Johan,

I think it may be worth to close issue 4039 as "won't fix" in this case.
Since it's extremely low chance that we go back to have .svn per every
directory.

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Angelo Tavares <angelo_at_mega.com.br> wrote:

> Yes, I have "subst M: C:\SomeDir\Project\subdir", but thanks for the
> feedback.
>
> With "subst M: C:\SomeDir\Project", works very well indeed
>
>
>
> 2013/8/19 Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com>
>
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Angelo Tavares <angelo_at_mega.com.br>
>> wrote:
>> > My case is creating subst working areas, which is not presented the
>> features
>> > of subversion.
>> >
>>
>> Can you please give a bit more detail? What do you mean by "creating
>> subst working areas"?
>>
>> Do you mean, for instance, that you have a working copy in
>> C:\SomeDir\Project (which is the root of the working copy), and you
>> execute "subst M: C:\SomeDir\Project"? If so, that works fine (just
>> tried it with 1.7 and 1.8).
>>
>> But if you want "subst M: C:\SomeDir\Project\subdir", that won't work,
>> and like Ivan said, will probably never be fixed (it really doesn't
>> fit with the working copy design of 1.7+, where all SVN metadata is
>> centralized in the root of the working copy).
>>
>> --
>> Johan
>>
>
>

-- 
Ivan Zhakov
CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
Received on 2013-09-05 15:21:42 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.