[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn move and <at> sign in filepath

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 20:29:34 +0300

I agree that it's a bug that, given a file 'foo', when 'bar' does not
exist[1],
   svn copy foo bar@
and
   svn move foo bar@
don't create a destination file with the same name. (It's probably
"bar@" that's the correct desination name in this case.) Can you please
file an issue for this?

Thanks

Daniel

Варфоломеев Игорь wrote on Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:32:42 +0400:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I think, I ran into a bug:
>
>
>
> although svn book declares “add one more @-sign” principle
>
> (http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.pegrevs.html ),
>
> it looks like it’s working incorrectly in case of “svn move”.
>
>
>
> %svn% move wc\@2.txt@ wc\A\@2.txt@
>
>
>
> - this would result in “wc\A\@2.txt@” file, instead of “wc\A\@2.txt”.
>
>
>
>
>
> It’s noteworthy, that “svn copy” works as it should.
>
>
>
> Please, find the full reproduction script here: https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8FD4EC3161ABA67A!939 .
>
>
>
> tested on svn, version 1.8.0 (r1490375);
>
> compiled Jun 17 2013, 19:47:41 on x86-microsoft-windows.
>
> (Part of Tortoise SVN 1.8.0 x64 <at> Win7 x64).
>
>
>
>
>
> PS
>
> I’m not subscribed and would appreciate being explicitly Cc:ed in any responses.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Igor Varfolomeev
>
>
>
Received on 2013-07-09 19:30:13 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.