[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Expected performance

From: Andreas Krey <a.krey_at_gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 11:02:10 +0200

On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:52:22 +0000, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
...
> am Dienstag, 9. Juli 2013 um 07:31 schrieben Sie:
>
> > 9550 Files, half a GB wc size, 15 seconds.
>
> > You may want to use another file system?
>
> Or your hardware and connection to your repo with it's server etc. I
> vote for the latter and claim that you didn't mention little details
> like an SSD for the working copy etc. Of course only because those
> would have only little impact on checkout performance... ;-)

No, that is an admittedly beefy machine with rotating rust
(although possibly raided), and GBit network access to the server.
Neither does the server have SSDs.

But the 1.5MByte/s that gets mentioned here seems quite unambitious;
with halfways decent hardware you should be able, in an svn checkout,
to saturate any network below 100MBit/s - the machine now under my desk
writes a tree of 100000 files and 7GB in about a minute (that is
not an svn checkout).

Andreas

-- 
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
Received on 2013-07-09 11:02:55 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.