[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Expected performance

From: Andy Levy <andy.levy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 14:21:49 -0400

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Naumenko, Roman
<roman.naumenko_at_rbccm.com> wrote:
> On 2013/07/08 2:06 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
>> On 7/8/2013 11:32 AM, Naumenko, Roman wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> How fast would you expect svn checkout to be from a server like one
>>> below? Considering eveyrthing on the server functioning as expected.
>>>
>> Our bottleneck is usually the CPU, but we're doing svn+ssh access. So
>> I lean towards a few less but more powerful cores.
>>
>> The only time we thrash the disks is when doing the nightly hotcopy of
>> our repositories (total of about 110GB).
>
> That box has more than enough CPUs (forty), cores are barely utilized.
> How is the access over ssh can be configured? I thought it's only
> http(s) or svn proto.

Unless you've got a very, very heavily utilized server, more than 4
cores is probably overkill. Disk I/O is more important than CPU cores
for most users.
Received on 2013-07-08 20:23:02 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.