Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 00:10:20 +0200

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:20:37PM -0400, Andrew Reedick wrote:
> Metadata could work. A "svn mkbranch" command that would run "svn
> copy" plus "svn propset" indicating that this is a branch root.

More than a week ago, this exact idea was already mentioned:
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2013-05/0109.shtml

In the *same* mailing list thread.

Looks like this discussion has entered an infinite loop.
Received on 2013-05-22 00:11:15 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jeffrey Walton: "Use Subversion to Manage Git?"
Previous message: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
In reply to: Andrew Reedick: "RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Next in thread: C. Michael Pilato: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Reply: C. Michael Pilato: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]