Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

From: Thorsten SchÃ¶ning <tschoening_at_am-soft.de>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 23:11:39 +0200

Guten Tag Andrew Reedick,
am Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013 um 21:27 schrieben Sie:

> It's about presentation. Keep the superfluous dir components
> internal and hidden from the average user.

Clearly a -1/dislike from me. :-)

Mit freundlichen GrÃ¼ÃŸen,

Thorsten SchÃ¶ning

-- 
Thorsten SchÃ¶ning       E-Mail:Thorsten.Schoening_at_AM-SoFT.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme      http://www.AM-SoFT.de/
Telefon...........05151-  9468- 55
Fax...............05151-  9468- 88
Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04
AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - GeschÃ¤ftsfÃ¼hrer: Andreas Muchow

Received on 2013-05-21 23:12:05 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Previous message: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: svnlook cat seems to swallow byte order marks"
In reply to: Andrew Reedick: "RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Next in thread: Zé: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]