Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 21:35:53 +0200

On 21.05.2013 21:27, Andrew Reedick wrote:
> Anyway, I'm nearly done with implementing my "find common ancestor"
> script that seems resistant to edge conditions, so I'll stop rambling.

Ah ... if that's what started the whole thread ... have you considered
that the Subversion libraries already have that functionality, and that
it's accessible through a number of script language wrappers?

-- Brane

-- 
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com

Received on 2013-05-21 21:36:30 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Andrew Reedick: "RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Previous message: Andrew Reedick: "RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
In reply to: Andrew Reedick: "RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Next in thread: Andrew Reedick: "RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Reply: Andrew Reedick: "RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]