Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Zé <jose.passes_at_gmx.com> wrote:
> On 05/18/2013 07:16 PM, David Chapman wrote:
>>
>>
>> You are pretty insistent that there is One True Way to use branches in
>> development.
>
>
> No, I'm stating that if all a SCM does is track changes made to the contents
> of a directory and you rely on changes made to that directory to emulate
> branches, then there are some significant downsides to this approach when
> compared with SCM systems which do offer support for branching.

You've been doing a lot more. I've read what you've written. You
consistently ignore your own previous claims, guidance or refutations
or information from others. You clearly want what you want, the way
you want it, and will accept nothing less than absolute confirmation
of your frankly unfounded claims about what branching and tagging
actually are and how they work, despite numerous references and
explanations.

I hate to do this on a really useful technical mailing list. But
you're clearly wasting everyone's time, and it's time to killfile you.

*plonk*.
Received on 2013-05-19 14:38:20 CEST