Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 05:57:31 +0300

Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, May 18, 2013 at 23:38:11 +0200:
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Andreas Krey <a.krey_at_gmx.de> wrote:
> > The good old "'svn commit file; svn log' doesn't show the commit to
> > file" issue?
>
> Sorry? What issue is that?
>

This one is actually in the FAQ. It's inherent to how mixed-revision
working copies work, but the workaround is trivial:

svn commit file; svn log -l1 file

Daniel
(I didn't even have to specify an operative or peg revision, in this
particular case)
Received on 2013-05-19 04:58:13 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Previous message: Johan Corveleyn: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
In reply to: Johan Corveleyn: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Next in thread: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]