Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
>> I would like to see more "first class" support for projects and/or
>> defining a project root. For example, perhaps there can be an
>> svn:projectroot property that must be on a folder and the branch/merge
>> command will only work on project roots. If that is done of course the
>> maintain backward compatibility there could be a switch in the client
>> config to allow for bypassing this requirement, or perhaps the --force
>> switch could do it. Also, a property can be place on a branch so that
>> tooling can know it is actually a semantic branch rather than just a
>> fork (copy).
> This idea has been discussed before and could still be viable in
> the future.
Maybe it is just my misconception, but I've always thought of the
difference between svn and git as being that svn conceptually tracks
complete revisions although sometimes it might generate or store
differences for some operations or internal storage convenience, where
git tracks changesets although it often has to generate complete
revisions. The nature of branches seems to relate better to
changesets since you are likely to want to merge/apply the same
changesets to different places - but, if you track the changesets you
have to anchor those changes to the tree that was the base for the
Received on 2013-05-13 18:32:48 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users