Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

From: ZÃ© <jose.passes_at_gmx.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 18:25:33 +0100

On 05/09/2013 09:35 PM, Branko ÄŒibej wrote:
> The real problem here is that Subversion does not treat/renames/ as
> atomic operations.

I think that the real problem here is that Subversion doesn't support
branches. The fact is that moving or copying a file or directory around
is not the semantical equivalent of creating a branch. Therefore, if the
same operation is used to perform both then one will not be supported as
well as it could be.

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Zé: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Previous message: Ravi Roy: "(20014)Internal error: proxy: error reading status line from remote server"
In reply to: Branko ÄŒibej: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Next in thread: Branko ÄŒibej: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Reply: Branko ÄŒibej: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"
Reply: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]