RE: svnsync bug ?
From: KLOCK Laurent <Laurent.KLOCK_at_intrasoft-intl.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:38:52 +0100
For sure, I don't have any non-repository directories in the master.
When I wrote a lot of things are missing...I meant actually, there is nothing at all...
When I list the content of the target with svn list file://localhost:/disk1/svn
The source contains also binaries files, if only the initial revision of them would have been copied over, the final target size would already be bigger....
I had a look at the revisions on both sides:
On Master:
[xtnet_svn_at_lux-svn db]$ cat revs/0/1
PLAIN
_0.0.t0-0 add-dir false false /CDBuilder
118 242
On Target:
[root_at_porfyra db]# cat revs/0/1
0 140
root_at_porfyra db]# cat revs/0/1
0 140
0 139
0 139
0 139
-----Original Message-----
"KLOCK Laurent" <Laurent.KLOCK_at_intrasoft-intl.com> writes:
> It syncs up to the latest revision and finishes without any error.
Various things are possible. There might be lots of shared content and the master might have rep-sharing disabled. The master might have lots of abandonded transactions. The master might have lots of exclusive file locks. You may have non-repository files located inside the master by accident.
Look inside the repository directories and compare the size of the subdirectories.
> 24806 2013-03-26T11:55:31.407067Z - - xtnet_svn replay
svnserve logs the replay "low water mark" revision, rather then the revisions being replayed, so r0 is expected. (I'm not sure why we choose to log the low water mark revision.)
-- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/downloadReceived on 2013-03-26 14:39:28 CET |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.