Re: SVN access denied when comparing revisions

Phillip,

Thanks for the reply. If the line anon-access = read is commented out,
can't that be interpreted as anon-access = none on startup of the server?

It seems like a 1 line conditional statement is all that is needed to fix
this particular issue. I realize it is related to a larger bug.

Thanks,

Bill

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Philip Martin
<philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>wrote:

> Bill Cebula <bill.cebula_at_gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I would expect the same behavior whether the* anon-access* line is
> > commented or whether it is specified as *none*. However, if the
> > anon-access line is commented, you get the error even though you the*
> > authz* specifies read/write privileges for
> > the entire repository.
>
> This is a known bug. The svn:// protocol chooses either anonymous or
> authenticated access right at the start of the connection and has no way
> to upgrade later.
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2712
>
> --
> Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
> http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
>
Received on 2013-03-22 00:30:56 CET