On 03/15/2013 11:02 AM, Tom wrote:
>> The question is: what is the very first revision for the directory which is
>> called "branch10" in HEAD? You should be able to get the answer using this
>> command:
>>
>> svn log -q -r1:HEAD --limit 1 https:\\...\branch10
>
> I tried this for both my branches:
> svn log -q -r1:HEAD --limit 1 https:\\...\branch10
> svn log -q -r1:HEAD --limit 1 https:\\...\branch7
>
> and for both of them I get revision: r69
> Indeed both branches have the common ancester.
>
>> If the answer is a revision that's younger than r11893, then that explains
>> why Subversion has complained.
>
> For both the branches the revision is older.
> So, If I get it right, the "expected" behaviour in this case is: there is
> checkouted object found in the 'line of history'
> (in my case of https:\\...\branch7 the object was in r11893 in ancestor
> branch). This is great, because this was excpected also by me :)
>
> There is one remaining question: Why is this not working for the second
> branch:
> https:\\...\branch10 (error E195012 occures).
>
> Maybe there could arise some other complications about which I dont know ...
> Nevertheless I am glad to know about the expected behavior.
If you were able to run 'svn log' all the way back to revision 69, then I
would expect I would expect that your checkouts would all have worked, then.
Weird. I, too, wonder what's going on...
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
Received on 2013-03-15 16:22:12 CET