Re: a svn revert question
From: Thorsten Schöning <tschoening_at_am-soft.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 17:05:11 +0100
Guten Tag frame,
> Let's say my project head is r130. We found a bug, started in r111.
The easiest way would not to do what you describe, but create a new
Everything else is a bit more complicated as you can't commit on top
What you can't do is checking out r111 and commit directly on top of
This may help to understand the differences:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1214939/update-item-to-revision-vs-revert-to-revision
> Please don't criticize me on why not just fix r130 to become r131,
Nevertheless it would be good to know why you need to fix your old
> I think revert is somehow related, so I put it on the subject,
revert is the wrong command, what you have to look at is update and
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/345997/better-way-to-revert-to-a-previous-svn-revision-of-a-file
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thorsten Schöning
-- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail:Thorsten.Schoening_at_AM-SoFT.de AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas MuchowReceived on 2013-03-08 17:05:43 CET |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.