non-canonical list addresses Re: Restoring a single numbered file into revs directory

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:33:15 +0200

I've replied (tldr: yes, but probably hardware problems involved), and
my reply bounced since the list address used wasn't the canonical one.
So, I'm one bounce message richer, and my reply didn't get delivered to
list members. Any reason we shouldn't just ban emails that don't use
the correct list address?
Received on 2012-12-21 06:33:58 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Thorsten Schöning: "Re: For a large post-commit failed"
Previous message: dhanushka ranasinghe: "For a large post-commit failed"
In reply to: pcottrill_at_imci.net: "Restoring a single numbered file into revs directory"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]