Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 18:26:04 +0000:
> Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> writes:
>
> > Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:59:47 -0600:
> >> But, the copy built by svnsync doesn't necessarily
> >> get stored the same way, does it?
> >
> > I think in 1.8/fsfs it will byte-for-byte identical. (except
> > rep-cache.db, but you can remove that file without consequences)
> >
> > There was a dev@ thread by philipm about this not too long ago.
>
> No, an svnsync mirror is usually not identical to the master. It does
> contain the same versioned data but the representation of that data is
> different. For example, every failed commit on the master will bump the
> fsfs sequence number and that will cause the node-revision-ids to be
> different.
Node-revision-id's in revisions don't embed transaction id's...
For example the noderev header (yes, header, not just id) of
/subversion/trunk/notes is identical between svn.us and svn.eu.
Received on 2012-11-29 19:31:28 CET