I am using aliases (as typical with LDAP), so the cause you described should not happen. Also, everything is lower case (alias names, group names, etc.). And I do not have any relation between the rules‘ paths and the failing paths, as I said initially.
Also, I did not find a documentation on „force-username-case“. Can you point me to a description on the web? J
Von: Jan Keirse [mailto:jan.keirse_at_tvh.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 26. November 2012 09:15
An: Markus Karg
Cc: users_at_subversion.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Path-based authorization buggy when using SASL-LDAP
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Markus Karg <karg_at_quipsy.de> wrote:
I wonder why this should produce this effect? I mean, why is it working with 99% of all paths, but not with some others?
Say that you are logged in as Markus (instead of markus), if some authz rules refer to Markus and others refer to markus, or some rules refer to * and others to markus, only the rules refering to markus would 'fail'. If tthis is not the case force-username-case isn't going to help you and you have another problem.
Kind Regards,
JAN KEIRSE
CORPORATE SERVICES • Specialist Software Developer
Received on 2012-11-26 09:29:00 CET