On 2012/11/20 12:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:32:18 +0100:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:14:41AM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 21:07:59 +0100:
>>>> Extract these reps from the FSFS data of the temporary repository and
>>>> stitch them into the broken repository at appropriate places, recalculating
>>>> checksums where necessary,
>>> Instead of recalculating, you ought to be able to set them to all-zeroes.
>> Ah, that's neat :)
>>
>> Oh, and make sure to remove rows containing checksums of corrupted reps
>> from rep-cache.db. Alternatively, disable rep-sharing in fsfs.conf.
>> Else, you might end up with new revisions pointing at existing bad reps
> But such pointers might already exist in revisions that were committed
> after the committed revision and before it was fixed, right?
>
> In which case - there is no easy way to find all of them (short of
> exhaustive search), but fixing them should be easy (especially given that
> the sha1 and uniquifier fields in rep reference lines are optional).
>
>> (in particular if people keep trying to add the same file again and
>> again under different names in an attempt to repair it.)
Thanks everyone for your input, I'll try those tips and if I get stuck
again I'll post here again.
Received on 2012-11-24 12:05:39 CET