[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

ignore ancestry and record only

From: chroyer <christophe_r_at_comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 19:07:01 +0000 (UTC)

Hi all,

I was wondering if the following scenario makes sense, or if this is asking for problems.

* I am regularly merging differences between 2 trees (I won't go in too much details here...those tree are not really under my control; I put those them in the tags area, and I want to merge the changes between 2 consecutive such snapshots. In my case, I can not just use a branch and update it with the latest version - the tree gets modifications before being tagged).

* to merge the differences between 2 snapshots, I am using --ignore-ancestry (otherwise I see a lot of files being "replaced"). This works great

* since --ignore-ancestry makes me loose the merge info, before I commit the merge results, I merge again but this time with --record-only (and without --ignore-ancestry)

* now I can commit and it seems that I have the best of both worlds...

I think this is more an svn question (but I am using I am using tsvn 1.6.16). The server is svn 1.6.17
Does anyone have experience with similar scenario?

Thank you,
Christophe
Received on 2012-10-01 21:07:41 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.