[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subtree mergeinfo

From: Michael T <raselmsh_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:40:01 +0000 (UTC)

Varnau, Steve (Seaquest R&D <steve.varnau <at> hp.com> writes:
> > -----Original Message-----
[...]
> > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:stsp <at> elego.de]
> > The easiest thing to do is to just leave the mergeinfo alone and upgrade
> > all clients to 1.7. This will get rid of superfluous mergeinfo
> > modifications during merges. See here for more information:
> > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#subtree-
> > mergeinfo-recording
[...]
>
> Good advice. Get users on 1.7 clients! For the cases where a sub-tree was
merged, a relatively safe thing to
> do is to run the same (branches/revs) merges into the root of your trunk.
Assuming the sub-trees already
> picked up the real content changes, these additional merge changes should just
be updating the
> root-level meta-data, and if you get all such branches, then the merge-info
will elide from the sub-tree.
>
> Let the merge command do the dirty work, rather than edit merge-info!
Thank you both! We will presumably all end up on svn 1.7 sooner or later, and
hopefully it (or later versions) will not have too much trouble with the
not-quite-clean state of the mergeinfo. Though I can't say that anyone seems to
be suffering much with 1.5 and 1.6 apart from the annoying proliferation during
merges, so presumably things will only get better!

Regards,

Michael
Received on 2012-09-19 20:40:47 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.