On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Jim Ravagno <jravagno_at_comcast.net> wrote:
> I'm stuck with Windows 2003 server because of the budget.
> I would have rather put this on a Solaris OS but that's what I have to work
> with, My second choice was Windows 2008 R2, but again I'm stuck with
OK, you just made me giggle. Solaris has to be considered legacy, at
this point: since Oracle bought Sun, they're pushing customers towards
Linux, particularly Oracle's rebuild of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, as
quickly as possible. You'd be out of the frying pan and into the fire
RHEL works well, and is very stable for servers. There are free
rebuilds of it, particularly the very well integrated Scientific
Linux, if you're feeling budget conscious. SL 6.3 comes with
Subversion 1.6.11 and is quite stable.
If you want the latest/greatest Subversion for that distro, the
RPMforge repository is about to include Subversion 1.7.6 from my
published tools at http://github.com/nkadel/. Or you can test invest
in commercial support from Wandisco or CollabNet (and test their free
downloads for RHEL, which work very well.)
> When I get back to work on Tuesday I'm wiping out everything and starting
> Subversion Edge was suggested to me so I'm going with that.
> Hopefully the doc.'s are in the program.
Good luck with that: it's not a toolkit I've used. The hard part. for
me, has been negotiating and implementing account management and
workflow, which are not really inherent in Subversion itself. There
are so *many* options, I'm encouring the commercial packages (such as
WanDisco or CollabNet) for server setups.
> Thank you,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nkadel_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 5:25 PM
> To: jravagno_at_comcast.net
> Cc: users_at_subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Subversion 2.2
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM, <jravagno_at_comcast.net> wrote:
>> I was asked to install a source control site for Engineering. They
>> asked for Subversion.
>> This is a Rat Hole I didn't want to go down, not only to mention the
>> documention is horrible.
> Why is it a rat hole?
>> Apache 2.2> Tortoise> WebSVN> PHP 4.3.0. and now Wix installer on
>> 2003 Server.
> Well, there's a lot of your problem, right there. 2003 is seriously out of
> date, and you seem to have trail of requirements, such as WebSVN, any one
> of which may create integration problems. Having to mix and match and merge
> these is when and why you can call of of the commercial support companies,
> such as CollabNet or WanDisco, to help get the whole thing integrated for
>> Does anybody out there have this install guide in a format that's
> Which Subversion release, and which Windows compatible Apache?
>> I need to have this web accessable, it works great as a stand alone.
>> Jim R.
Received on 2012-09-01 17:01:47 CEST