[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 'svn incoming'

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 21:54:49 +0300

Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 20:48:56 +0200:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:45:12PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 20:20:27 +0200:
> > > So 'svn status -u' is a better equivalent to 'hg incoming' than
> > > 'svn log -rBASE:HEAD'. But, in most cases, the log command will show
> > > what you're interested in.
> >
> > For completeness, using 'svnversion' in combination with 'svn log' can
> > give a superset of the changes that will be applied:
> >
> > % svnversion
> > 38:52M
> > % svn log -r 38:HEAD
> >
> > Making this work in presence of switched subtrees ('S' in the `svnversion`
> > output) is left as a exercise for the reader. It's not a one-liner.
>
> Maybe something like 'svn status -u --log' that does the right thing
> wouldn't be too bad to have afterall :)

It needs to take the --diff option too, then?

Maybe

svn log -r TREEBASE:HEAD
Received on 2012-05-08 20:55:25 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.