[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Error in nitial Run of basic_tests.py

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:31:07 +0300

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 21:38:59 -0400:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>wrote:
>
> > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 16:56:54 -0400:
> > > If you're up for some testing, there are tools I've submitted to
> > Repoforge
> > > for building 1.6.18 and 1.7.4 over at http://www.github.com/nkadel/ All
> > the
> > > patches and .spec files for building the RPM's, compatble for RHEL 4, 5,
> > > and 6. You could rsync the repository to a new environment, build and
> > > install the new RPM's there, and see if the error still occurs.
> > >
> > > I did have to turn off the "make_check" option for normal RPM
> > compilation,
> > > because it takes about an hour to run and it always fails
> >
> > SKIP and XFAIL are not errors. FAIL are errors. XPASS are not supposed
> > to happen in release tarballs, but if they do they are treated like FAIL
> > is for the purposes of success/failure. The fact that your 'make check'
> > exits non-zero despite having neither FAIL nor XPASS is a bug.
> >
> That's what I get for just posting the last few lines.

Recent code prints FAILs after XFAILs and SKIPs, so I can safely say
that either you didn't have any FAILs or you posted the output of an
oldish version (1.6.x perhaps?).
Received on 2012-04-29 07:31:52 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.