[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Implementations of an SVN/DAV aware proxy?

From: Tim Watts <tw_at_dionic.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:40:20 +0100

Hi Daniel,

All 1.6.x sadly...

But it is OK - my colleague agrees that we can just convert the working
copies as required - this is probably better as then we do not have to
support some legacy crap forever :)

I am surprised though - that it is so unusual to want to build a DAV/SVN
proxy with pathname translation...

Cheers,

Tim

On 17/04/12 11:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> svn 1.7 is supposed to follow 301(permanent)/302(temporary) redirects.
> Are you on 1.7.x?
>
> Tim Watts wrote on Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:25:01 +0100:
>> Lorenz<lorenznl<at> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Tim Watts wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>> We're changing SVN servers from mod-dav-svn to SCM-Manager - and one
>>>> minor fly in the ointment is the style of our old repo URI, which was
>>>> of
>>>> the form:
>>
>>> is there a reason you can't just use 'svn relocate' on the working
>>> copies?
>>> --
>>>
>>> Lorenz
>>
>> Sir - you are a genius.
>>
>> Yes - this would be fine. After all, if a repo working copy is based
>> off the old server (RIP) then operations will fail, acting as a call to
>> run svn relocate. Easy to do, easy to document...
>>
>> I did not know about that operation.
>>
>> Thanks :)
>>
>> Tim
>> --
>> Tim Watts
>> Personal Blog: http://www.dionic.net/tim/

-- 
Tim Watts
Personal Blog: http://www.dionic.net/tim/
Received on 2012-04-17 13:40:54 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.