[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svnsync: Error while replaying commit

From: Gary <listgj-svn_at_yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:27:59 +0100 (BST)

----- Original Message -----
From: Henrik Sundberg

> Do you have a precommit hook now that was not there when revs 81-82
were committed?
There are no hooks as far as I know. (I'm not an admin, and the admin is not very forthcoming on.. well, anything, really).

> Svn log will show the revisions whereever in the repository they were
> made. Are they missing for real?
Yes the revisions are really missing:
  $ svn log
  [snip]
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  r83 | gpspbu | 2011-06-24 12:34:38
+0200 (Fri, 24 Jun 2011) | 1 line

  added missing file
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  r80 | gpspbu | 2011-06-23 16:23:46
+0200 (Thu, 23 Jun 2011) | 1 line

  Added WP31
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  r79 | gpspbu | 2011-06-23 15:58:15
+0200 (Thu, 23 Jun 2011) | 1 line

  Added a PhoneNumberUnlocker
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 15:25, Gary <listgj-svn_at_yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I see a lot of reports of this error, but little in the way of
> clear information as to what it might mean, or how to fix it:
>
> $ svnsync sync file://`pwd`/dest
> Committed revision 1.
> Copied properties for revision 1.
> Transmitting file data .....................
> [...]
> Committed revision 79.
> Copied properties for revision 79.
> Transmitting file data .......................
> Committed revision 80.
> Copied properties for revision 80.
> svnsync: Error while replaying commit
>
> Huh?
>
> If I look at the source server log, revs 81 & 82 are "missing"
> in the trunk. I imagine they are/were in a branch, which AFAIK
> is no longer available. Is there any way to get around this?
> Assuming that's the problem, of course.
>
Received on 2012-04-02 09:28:44 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.