On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Jason Wong <jwong1mail_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Daniel.
>
> I will give it a go and let you know what I find.
>
> Jason
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:
>> Jason,
>>
>> I've learnt yesterday something new about the minfo-cnt corruption bug:
>> it can manifest not only as absurdly high values (on the order of 2**70),
>> but as far smaller wrong increments too (such as increment of 172
>> instead of of 0 on one occasion).
>>
>> Could you determine whether said bug has occurred in your history? You
>> can do that by duplicating your repository using svnsync or dump|load,
>> running dump-noderev.pl on / of both copies at the same revisions, and
>> comparing the minfo-cnt values.
>>
>> I would be interested in knowing whether they are equal between the two
>> copies.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> Jason Wong wrote on Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:42:42 -0800:
>>> > ./dump-noderev.pl /repository / 61851
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> id: 0.0.r61851/33470
>>> type: dir
>>> pred: 0.0.r61850/3844
>>> count: 61818
>>> text: 61851 32225 1232 1232 7555349571e297c23e647cc2441d5b8f
>>> cpath: /
>>> copyroot: 0 /
>>> minfo-cnt: 25685
>>> ------------------------------
Hello Daniel.
The svnsync took a while to run once I got it going. I ran the command
on the hotcopy I had made originally to keep the results consistant.
I have run the following two commands:
dump-noderev.pl /repo /
dump-noderev.pl /mirror2 /
Here are the outputs from the commands:
dump-noderev.pl /repo /
---------------------
id: 0.0.r62104/28771
type: dir
pred: 0.0.r62103/28680
count: 62071
text: 62104 27520 1238 1238 ea635421e867454f9f7bc503c8160a2c
cpath: /
copyroot: 0 /
minfo-cnt: 25707
---------------------
dump-noderev.pl /mirror2 /
-----------------------
id: 0.0.r62104/6122
type: dir
pred: 0.0.r62103/6039
count: 62104
text: 62104 4874 1235 1235 1f315ed2437ba5d70dba2587d9ef2d5a
cpath: /
copyroot: 0 /
minfo-cnt: 25707
-----------------------
Is this in line with what you expected?
Jason Wong.
Received on 2012-03-28 20:49:54 CEST