On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:
> Jason Wong wrote on Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 13:41:19 -0700:
>> Hello Daniel, Philip.
>>
>> I have been following the thread: "#4129 is reproducible Re:
>> predecessor count for the root node-revision is wrong message".
>> It looks like you all have it figured out now. Good job.
>>
>> Do you need any more information from me at this point? Thanks.
>>
>
> Thanks Jason. It would be useful if you could confirm that you do not
> run into the error after rebuilding the server with r1302399 and
> r1302613 applied. (If you run the test suite, apply r1302539 and
> r1302591 too.) These revisions constitute the fix which is nominated
> for inclusion in 1.6.18 and 1.7.5; see ^/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS.
>
Hi Daniel.
The developer who built the svn client is away and will probably not be back
until later this week. What is your ETA for 1.7.5? Just wondering if that would
released before the developer I have is back.
Thanks.
Jason
> Cheers,
>
> Daniel
>
>> Jason Wong.
Received on 2012-03-19 23:35:26 CET