[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: predecessor count for the root node-revision is wrong message

From: Justin Johnson <justinandtonya_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 08:03:53 -0600

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:

> Justin Johnson wrote on Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 07:45:08 -0600:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Justin Johnson <
> justinandtonya_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de>
> wrote:
> > >> ... so please try SVNInMemoryCacheSize 0, and see if that makes the
> > >> issue less frequent.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I'm a dork. I will do so once I take care of the appropriate change
> > > control I have to deal with. Thanks.
> > >
> >
> > We made the change and problem is still occurring.
>
> OK. So that means that either membuffer isn't the cause of the error,
> or both membuffer and inprocess have (independent) bugs.
>
> That said, I'm happy to see that it took you less than a day to report
> that the bug no longer reproduces. Can you reproduce it at will?
>
>
No, but our server has about 2500 active users on it, so it doesn't take
long to see errors. If we make a configuration change and a day goes by
without the error showing up in the logs I would suspect the problem was
fixed. If a week were to pass with no error I would feel much more
confident.

Yesterday had 6 of the errors and 1 today so far.
Received on 2012-03-02 15:04:28 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.