Re: Why doesn't mergeinfo elision occur here?
From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 17:18:29 +0100
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 04:45:17PM +0100, André Hänsel wrote:
Mergeinfo elision is quite simplistic as of now.
Below, I am quoting Paul Burba in
A path P and some path-wise child of P called C:
Can the mergeinfo on C elide to P?
Looking at the intersection of the P and C's mergeinfo we have:
A) Common mergeinfo (that differs only by the path-wise difference
B) Mergeinfo exclusive to P - If *all* of this describes merges that
C) Mergeinfo exclusive to C - If all of this describes merges that are
If elision occurs in *all* three cases then the mergeinfo on C can elide to P.
Today only 'A' is supported when 'B' and 'C' are empty sets.
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.