[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Experiences with HA SVN over NFS

From: Brian Hourigan <bhourigan_at_mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:33:38 -0800

Hello everyone!

I have to implement a high availability solution for Mozilla's internal
SVN repository. It doesn't store the firefox code base but it's used
extensively for puppet configs, dns zones, etc. I've looked through the
archives and googled plenty. It's a critical service for us, so I would
really appreciate any feedback fellow SVN administrators can offer.

I've got two svn servers behind a round-robin load balancer connected to
a Netapp NFS volume. All of the repo data is stored on the Netapp with
the FSFS backend. Despite my best efforts I've been unable to break
anything or otherwise cause corruption. It's entirely possible the lack
of corruption is with my test methodology, but I don't know any better.

Is this a sane architecture?
Does anyone have operational experience with this type of setup?
Is there a better way?

- Brian
Received on 2012-01-11 01:34:14 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.