Re: svn status doesn't seem to reflect the status of the working copy

From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 06:45:57 -0500

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Andreas Du Rietz <durred_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I just completed my worst merge yet, or so I thought. We use SVN 1.4 (I
> know, we should upgrade). The branch has been synched multiple times with
> trunk so I used this approach:

Why don't you upgrade? I gotta tell you, if you're using an OS old
enough that you can't build or install a more recent release on it,
you probably have deeper troubles than this.
Received on 2011-12-29 12:46:33 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Pavel Krupets: "Re: svn update issues..."
Previous message: Jan Keirse: "Re: svnsync, discard master and start using slave as new master"
In reply to: Andreas Du Rietz: "svn status doesn't seem to reflect the status of the working copy"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]