On 7/19/2011 7:15 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> CollabNet did not post anything. In an open-source project (mine), on
> a hosting site operated by CollabNet, I posted my Windows binaries in
> a listing labelled "Development Builds" just as I have been doing from
> trunk for months. This is not different than TortoiseSVN, Subclipse
> or AnkhSVN which all post nightly builds so people can try our
> software. I did not post the source tarball, I posted my build of the
> Windows binaries and I will likely continue to do so as the branch
> progresses towards release.
I think the concern is that it was named "beta1", when the Subversion
project hadn't announced any "beta1". TSVN and AnkhSVN nightly builds
just have version/revision numbers, without any sort of alpha/beta
designation--e.g., "TortoiseSVN-1.6.99.21696-dev-x64-svn-1.7.0-dev.msi"
or "AnkhSvn-Daily-2.3.10315.msi"
Received on 2011-07-20 02:32:19 CEST