[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: More questions

From: Stefan Hett <stefan_at_egosoft.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:34:27 +0200

> More noob questions about svn...
> 1. Is using externals a good idea?
> I've been told that it's generally a bad idea, and it feels to me like
> a bad idea, since it obfuscates what's going on in the repo. Is it
> often done for professional projects?
It depends on the use-case.
There are situations where using externals are beneficial, but there are
also several caveats related to externals.

One real-life example we in our company had trouble with was with a 1.6
repository where we wanted to replace externals with a real copy of the
source (i.e. remove the external property and copy the real source to
the folder). That lead to tree conflicts when merging/updating
WCs/branches and took a lot more time than anticipated. That was
especially a PITA since these externals weren't actually necessary in
the first place.

You might wanna check-out the issues related to externals which might
give you a rough feeling of known bugs (search for "external" in the
summary and optionally limit the search to issues for 1.6.x)

Several of the known issues with externals have been dealt with in the
upcoming 1.7 release, so things will improve with the next version
beyond what has already been solved in the 1.6-branch.

Another caveat of externals is that they are generally slower when doing
an update, since each external has to be checked individually to verify
wheter it's up-to-date in the WC.

I tend to live with a rule of thumb here:
Use externals where necessary, avoid them where possible.

Received on 2011-06-14 21:35:01 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.