[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Is rep-sharing enabled by default?

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 10:41:54 +0200

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:08:45AM +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we sync our repositories to a second server using svnsync sync and
> today I wondered why a commit in the master with several MB in size is
> only some kb in the synced slave. I made two commits with exactly the
> same data in two different directories and the first commit was about
> some MB in size, where the second was really small. In the revision
> file of the second commit I found something like "text: 2638" where
> 2638 is the first, bigger commit. Therefore I thought of rep-sharing
> which sounds like it would work this way, but I didn't configured it.
>
> To come to an end, is rep-sharing enabled by default? I did find a
> several MB sized rep-cache.db in the repository, but fsfs.conf says
> # enable-rep-sharing = false.
>

The default is in fact true, if the repository format is new enough
to support it.
Received on 2011-05-24 10:42:50 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.