On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Ben Carbery <ben.carbery_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I sometimes forget that I perceive time on a different scale to you mortals.
>
> On 28 April 2011 15:43, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Ben Carbery <ben.carbery_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Ok running 1.6 now and repository upgraded. Must have been a recent RH
>> > patch?
>>
>> Not recent: it was published with RHEL 5.6.
Heh. It was "not recent" enough for CentOS delayed release process to
cost them a whole slew of users to Scientific Linux in response to 3
months of "when it's ready" messages from the project engineers.
They've still not released CentOS 6.0. RHEL compatible developers are
shifting distribution in droves.
This is actually good for Subversion, at least this year. Sites
reluctant to do wholesale updates in the name if "stability, such as
going to 5.6 and getting Subversion 1.6, can simply update to RHEL 6
or Scientific Linux 6 and get the core of the update built-in.
Received on 2011-04-29 02:44:35 CEST