RE: Unexpected behaviour with SVNPath/SVNParentPath mixture

Hi Ryan,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-2011a_at_ryandesign.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 2:25 AM
> To: Jans Ullrich
> Cc: users_at_subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Unexpected behaviour with SVNPath/SVNParentPath mixture
>
> You will either want a single Location block containing an SVNParentPath
> directive, or multiple Location blocks each with an SVNPath directive. Not
> both.

I noticed that. ;-)

The question is, why not? According to the Apache docs, it should work, so it looks like a problem in subversion. Can this be considered a bug? Should I file an issue?

We'd like to provide our users with the ability to create repositories themselves, then possibly promote select repositories to a different permission set. Restricting ourselves to only using SVNPath would be inconvenient... ;-)

Cheers,

Ulli

----------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: This e-mail may contain confidential information
intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please do not disclose it to anyone, notify
the sender promptly, and delete the message from your system.
Thank you.
Received on 2011-03-25 11:33:05 CET