[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Capacity limit on Branches and Tags in SVN

From: Andy Levy <andy.levy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:59:49 -0500

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 08:51, Colin Fraser <colin.fraser_at_levelfour.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking to migrate an existing repository from CVS into SVN and I've been trying to find concrete examples of capacity limits.
>
> Our workflow is to create private branches for bug fixing, feature development, RC testing etc so we end up with a lot of branches and tags over time - CVS is now struggling to support this (time taken to branch is hours).  I've seen plenty examples given about the physical size or number of commits supported in an SVN repository, but nothing about the number of branches and tags that can be supported.
>
> Basically I'm concerned about performance degradation over time if we continue to create many branches.  The numbers I'm talking about are around 2000 branches and 3000 tags, increasing by about 500 per year.
>
> Any information or links appreciated.

Subversion branches and tags are just specially-named copies (you
don't even have to call them "branch" or "tag" if you don't want).
Copies in Subversion are cheap - each will take maybe 1KB of space.
See http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.using.html

You shouldn't have the same trouble in SVN as you've had in CVS.
Received on 2011-03-01 15:01:23 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.