On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:46 PM, David Darj <zid_at_alagazam.net> wrote:
> On 2010-12-17 22:58, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:42 PM,<rj_at_elilabs.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Any idea why TSVN 1.6.12 Build 20536 2010/11/24 claims to be using SVN
>>> 1.6.15 before it was released?
>>
>> Subversion 1.6.15 was released several weeks ago. David is just one
>> person of many that creates a binary version and he is simply
>> announcing availability of his binaries. TortoiseSVN does not release
>> until we have officially released the source.
>>
>> BTW, David is there really any reason to broadcast your release in
>> these forums? CollabNet has never done that (and would not want to
>> see us start). While I think the info is somewhat useful in general
>> it would get ugly if everyone that produced binaries announced it on
>> all the lists every time. You can announce it on sf.net and users can
>> subscribe to lists or RSS feeds there if they want to be updated on
>> releases.
>>
> I just keep up the work where DJ Heap (and Troy Simpson) left off building
> and announcing these binaries.
> If it's not appropiate to announce it here I will stop.
>
> Anyway announcment on my Win32 build of Subversion will be announced at the
> sf page at https://sourceforge.net/projects/win32svn/ where a RSS feed is
> also available.
*I* appreciate seeing them, but I've made some informal announcements
for the RPMforge updates, especially for RHEL and CentOS users. Since
I tend to pre-test and submit the .spec files for the last few
releases, I may have some self-interest there.
Received on 2010-12-19 18:07:20 CET