Hi kevin,
This is indeed the stats package that I already have.
But it is a little sparse on documentation.
It has great statistics that are useful when I report on the whole project - but I have been unable to find a way to say,
Start at this Revision / in this path...
I did find this;
http://statsvn.1260.n2.nabble.com/forum/PostLink.jtp?post=5283797
Which I overlooked (that it actually uses the log you create, prior to running the jar) - but it does says that;
"the produced results are not the best since StatSVN assumes it knows all the data in the repository. "
The biggest issue I have really, is that I am not a java developer (not a SVN developer) for that matter.
So I really am unable to do it myself.
I'll give the svn log route a go and see how it works out.
On 11/12/2010, at 6:21 AM, Kevin Grover wrote:
> Check out StatSVN:
>
> http://www.statsvn.org/
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 20:46, Gavin Beau Baumanis <beau_at_palcare.com.au> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have been asked for some statistics about our code base and am hoping that someone might have had a task for something similar already, and will be able to help me out.
>
> Here is the text I was sent - but it is really just a guide - it is more a case of "something" to show as opposed to have any specific item(s).
>
> I do have a jar that I downloaded from SourceForge - that provides pretty much what I'm after.
> Lines of code / Churn,
> Number of commits etc.
>
> But it is based on the entire repository from revision 0:head.
>
> The specific request (below) comes from the point of view ;
> These are stats are from rev xxx - when we started work on the latest version.
>
> We don't have a classical "release" branch either - just a forever going trunk, so we can't use anything "path" specific to obtain the requested results either.
>
> Anyway - if you have ideas - I would be most grateful, here is the questions I was asked;
>
> Added xxx Lines of new code
> Removed xxx Lines of redundant code
> Performed more than xxx individual code changes.
>
>
> As always - thanks very much in advance!
>
> Gavin.
>
Received on 2010-12-11 12:28:08 CET