[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Status of SVNPathAuthz short_circuit

From: JamieEchlin <jamie.echlin_at_credit-suisse.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:54:44 -0800 (PST)

Bruno De Fraine wrote:
> Is my interpretation of "short_circuit" v.s. regular path-based
> authorization correct? Or if not, what is the impact of "short_circuit"?
> Since performance problems are so apparent with path-based authorization,
> why is this seemingly useful option given so little attention?

This is an excellent question, I have the same issues as Bruno, and I really
can't add anything to the question to make it clearer. Just that, to
rephrase, under what circumstances should you not use short_circuit?

NB Unfortunately the replies to this thread should actually be a different

cheers, jamie

View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Status-of-SVNPathAuthz-short_circuit-tp29354617p30341951.html
Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on 2010-11-30 18:55:20 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.