Re: URL-only renames adds svn:mergeinfo property

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:38:57PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> I don't see why it matters that it's a "sub-branch". It's still a
> (grand-)child of mybranch, so can perfectly inherit that mergeinfo.
> AFAIU it only needs explicit mergeinfo if it starts to deviate from
> the mybranch root (e.g. if something is (sync-)merged directly to the
> sub-branch). Or am I missing something?

Hmmm.. I don't see any reason either. Explicit mergeinfo could probably be
created later when the subtree actually becomes a merge target.
I guess the current logic in the code simply doesn't account for the case
where the copy destination is a child of the source? Not sure.

Stefan
Received on 2010-11-19 18:26:36 CET