[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Subversion vs multicore processors

From: Edward Ned Harvey <svn_at_nedharvey.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:29:10 -0500

> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikesell_at_gmail.com]
> > This is definitely off topic, but it's not RHEL4 or RHEL5 that's
> > It's the engineering tools, if you run them on whichever is the latest
> > version of RHEL. Because the developers who produce the tools don't
> have
> > access to the latest OS until the same time when you do.
> That's not true in general. Fedora releases cycle much faster than RHEL

You seem to be taking my specific comments, about my specific environment,
and misinterpreting them as some sort of generalization. That is not, and
never was the point that I made. I am not making a generalization about
RHEL or engineering tools in general. I have specific set of tools to
support, which are only supported on the latest 2 versions of RHEL. Of
which, things will be more difficult to support on the latest RHEL.

No generalization. There is a specific reason why I use RHEL4, and now that
RHEL6 is out, it's time to upgrade to RHEL5. I feel like a broken record
repeating myself here.

I don't know what the reasons are for other people to still use RHEL4. No
generalization. I'm just stating my own reasons.

And I'm only stating my own reasons, because of your obnoxious comments that
judgementally hinted there's no good reason to use an old OS.
Received on 2010-11-17 03:29:59 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.