[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Subversion vs multicore processors

From: Edward Ned Harvey <svn_at_nedharvey.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:17:12 -0500

> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nkadel_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 4:38 PM
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
> <svn_at_nedharvey.com> wrote:
> >> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nkadel_at_gmail.com]
> >>
> >> RHEL 5 still directly only provides Subversion 1.4.2. EPEL will not
> > replace it in
> >
> > On RHEL4 / RHEL5, I find it ridiculously easy to build svn from source.
> > Here is my build script:
> Great: now reliably provide HTTP/HTTPS access for offsite repository use,
> configure mod_dav_svn for local HTTP and HTTPS server usage, utilities
> configuration files, and assure that ssn+ssh discovered all the necessary
> libraries. Oh, you didn't have the include files installed for those and
> therefore ./configure didn't detect them?
> Whoops! Guess those parts all got left out of our script! And don't forget
> sqlite version issues!!!

Yikes, somebody doesn't mind taking a dump in public!

All I got to say is:
(a) works for me (including http & https) ... we don't use svn+ssh but I see
no reason it wouldn't work ... I know nothing of any sqlite issues you
allude to (nor do I care), so please put in the level of effort necessary
for things to work for you in your environment,
(b) other than building from source, there's no better way that I know to
get the latest svn 1.6 in rhel4 / rhel5. AKA, there are no rpm's available
that I know of, which I trust more than building from source as described.
Received on 2010-11-15 16:18:08 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.