[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Subversion/Tortoise questions

From: Ludwig, Michael <Michael.Ludwig_at_delphi-mb.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:45:07 +0100

> >> 4) Is the another GUI Subversion client that has better performance
> >> when content is being checked out to a Windows network drive.
> >
> > You won't find much variation, because they almost all use the same
> > core libraries or code.
>
> What about SvnAnt ?

SvnAnt uses the svnClientAdapter.jar, which in turn uses one of:

(1) JavaHL - Java/JNI to C++ core library interface [1]
(2) SvnKit - pure Java implementation [2]
(3) command line client, for example [3]

Performance should be best for JavaHL.

But a network drive is a network drive.

And the current working copy format generates many files.

Michael

[1] http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
[2] http://svnkit.com/
[3] http://www.sliksvn.com/
Received on 2010-11-10 15:45:47 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.