Re: Svn externals question

On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:03:58AM -0400, Jack Repenning wrote:
> If you do switch to the approach Stefan suggests (and I agree, it's
> probably more satisfactory) you also might want to use "svn switch"
> instead of the svn:externals. You'll still have the auditable,
> versioned definition of your canonical configuration (in the form of
> the script), but also there will be more freedom for variations, such
> as while preparing a new configuration.

Right. But note that switched subtrees cannot come from a different repository.
Received on 2010-11-05 16:10:19 CET