Re: Checked Subversions code with cppcheck

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Philipp Kloke <philipp.kloke_at_web.de> wrote:

> ?I am not sure if I am answering correctly (because I usually do not use
> mailing lists, I just selected the "Answer to all" button of my mail
> program), but I hope so.

> I now checked the code again, but with a newer version of cppcheck. The
> results are in the attachement.
>
> If you would like to try to check the code by yourself, see
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/cppcheck/ (the tool is very easy to use)
>
>
I wonder - it seems that Subversion is covered by static-analysis from
scan.coverity (http://scan.coverity.com/rungAll.html),
which is a powerful commercial analysis tool (not affiliated), but the
cppcheck report posted here has stuff that are surely detected by
coverity...
Are the dev's really using the reports from scan.coverity?
Received on 2010-10-07 22:07:35 CEST