[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Checked Subversions code with cppcheck

From: Itamar O <itamarost_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:06:58 +0200

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Philipp Kloke <philipp.kloke_at_web.de> wrote:

> ?I am not sure if I am answering correctly (because I usually do not use
> mailing lists, I just selected the "Answer to all" button of my mail
> program), but I hope so.

> I now checked the code again, but with a newer version of cppcheck. The
> results are in the attachement.
>
> If you would like to try to check the code by yourself, see
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/cppcheck/ (the tool is very easy to use)
>
>
I wonder - it seems that Subversion is covered by static-analysis from
scan.coverity (http://scan.coverity.com/rungAll.html),
which is a powerful commercial analysis tool (not affiliated), but the
cppcheck report posted here has stuff that are surely detected by
coverity...
Are the dev's really using the reports from scan.coverity?
Received on 2010-10-07 22:07:35 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.