[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion 1.6.13 Released

From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 07:46:53 -0400

2010/10/4 Thorsten Schöning <tschoening_at_am-soft.de>:
> Guten Tag Nico Kadel-Garcia,
> am Sonntag, 3. Oktober 2010 um 06:05 schrieben Sie:
>
>> Do you have some reason to want to do it under Windows, besides
>> personal familiarity?
>
> I for example just started with Windows and have Bugzilla and
> Subversion running on Windows integrated by using SCMBug. Windows
> binaries for subversion just make the life a bit easier. In my
> opinion it's no real solution to advise a virtual machine, there's a
> lot of overhead in running and supporting an linux for just one
> application. Patches, Backups etc. are just some.

There's real value in working with familiar tools, certainly. But for
a single purpose service, such as Subversion, it's possible to lock
down a single service device far more thoroughly, and have much better
control of when the system gets updated, backed up, etc. And the
filesystem performance of separate storage, such as NFS versus CIFS,
tends to be a lot better. CIFS 2 might address this: I've not had the
chance to try it.
Received on 2010-10-04 13:47:32 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.