[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Best way to "un-version control" a file?

From: Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:20:20 +0200

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:26 AM, David Huang <khym_at_azeotrope.org> wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:17 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>>> Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:27:40 -0500:
>>>> Am I wrong in thinking that similar accidents happen to everyone
>>>> eventually and that a feature to fix them would be desirable?
>>>
>>> Yes, the feature has its use case.  And if you'd like to see it
>>> implemented yesterday, that's cool.  Just don't assume that everyone
>>> thinks the same way please.
>>
>> Can you actually name anyone who thinks it's not a useful, or
>> potentially useful feature? Anyone?
>
> I suspect what was meant is that not everyone thinks obliterate needs to be "implemented yesterday" or that it's the "#1 request". I do think obliterate would be useful, but I personally have not ever needed it in my 2 or 3 years of administering an SVN repo, and don't forsee needing it in the future.

Indeed. Of course it's (very) useful. But there are other
features/improvements/... that are also useful (improved
merge-tracking/merging, tree-conflict resolution, repository-dictated
auto-props, general performance, working copy robustness, ... to name
a few), and depending on your situation you may find some of them more
useful/urgent than others. And as always in software development: you
can't do everything at once, you have to pick priorities and focus on
them. If you try to fix all problems for all people at once, you'll
never get anywhere.

Right now (for 1.7) the focus is on a better working copy system,
which is badly needed for robustness, speed, ... and for all future
enhancements that involve the client side.

There has been some work on obliterate, but it had to be deferred
because more resources were needed to finish the working-copy rewrite
for 1.7. I'm sure it will be implemented someday, but it might take
some more time ... Like Daivd said, it's still on the roadmap
(http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html).

Also keep in mind that this is an open-source product. Patches and
contributions of any kind are always welcome (there are lots of ways
to contribute, not only by writing code, see
http://subversion.apache.org/contributing.html). The developer
community is really friendly, so if you're interested in getting
involved (or helping them help you), please do :-).

Cheers,

-- 
Johan
Received on 2010-09-24 10:20:58 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.