On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Phillip Gussow wrote:
> Hi Allan,
>
> Thanks for your response. It seems this is indeed the path to take to solve
> my problem.
> Only downside is that I will list everything in the project. And there
> might be 1000s of files in there with only 3 locks on it. So it would be
> nice to have SVN do the filtering server side (in svnserve or the Apache
> mod.
>
> Thanks again and regards,
>
> Phillip
>
I solved a similar problem in the past by writing a little cgi script to wrap
up the call to lslocks and prettify the results with filtering based upon
user, path etc if that helps? It's a bit kludgy still as lslocks lists for an
entire repository and the first time it runs can take some time to return a
result if the repository is not cached in memory.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Campbell Allan [mailto:campbell.allan_at_sword-ciboodle.com]
> Sent: donderdag 16 september 2010 12:09
> To: users_at_subversion.apache.org
> Cc: Phillip Gussow
> Subject: Re: Recursively finding locks based on a URL
>
> On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Phillip Gussow wrote:
> > Hi group,
> >
> >
> >
> > I’m running into a situation where I need to know all locks that exist on
> > a
> > certain repository path.
> >
> > I know there is the svnadmin lslocks command. Which is in general what I
> > need, but I need to do it on an URL, because I don’t have access to the
> > server path.
> >
> >
> >
> > Back ground: we’re using a software package which utilizes the locks in
> > SVN
> > to prevent editing of unmergable content. But sometimes the product puts
> > ‘illegal’ locks on some files without showing their end users.
> >
> > So what I would like is to ask SVN for a list of all paths that are
> > locked.
> >
> > So something like this:
> >
> > svn lslocks https://server/svn/repository_name/project1/trunk
> >
> >
> >
> > Which produces something like this:
> >
> > user1 2010-09-16 10:00:00 /folder1/folder2/file.txt
> > The comment
> >
> > user3 2010-09-16 10:00:00 /folder1/folder2//folder3/something.jsp
> > The comment
> >
> > user1 2010-09-16 10:00:00 /folder1/morefile.xml
> > The comment
> >
> >
> >
> > Do I need to log a feature request for this? And if yes, how should I
> > phrase this?
> >
> > Or is there some other way to achieve this? Keep in mind that I have to
> > be able to run this on a URL from any client (of course using proper SVN
> > credentials J )
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance and regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Phillip Gussow
>
> if you are on an environment with access to perl
>
> svn ls -R --verbose <svn-url> \
>
> | perl -n -e 'print "$_" if /^\s*\d+\s\S+\s+O\s+/;'
>
> will do some of it. All you're looking for is an O in the third column of
> the
> output. I didn't bother optimising the regex to something nicer but it's
> possible or you could get svn to list in xml format and then it becomes a
> quite a bit easier to parse.
>
> I don't know what the comment would be as subversion does not require a
> comment to be provided when locking. If you wanted the last commit message
> then that would require a second request for each locked file. I also do
> not believe the date is the time of the lock being obtained.
--
__________________________________________________________________________________
Sword Ciboodle is the trading name of ciboodle Limited (a company
registered in Scotland with registered number SC143434 and whose
registered office is at India of Inchinnan, Renfrewshire, UK,
PA4 9LH) which is part of the Sword Group of companies.
This email (and any attachments) is intended for the named
recipient(s) and is private and confidential. If it is not for you,
please inform us and then delete it. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), the use, disclosure, copying or distribution of any
information contained within this email is prohibited. Messages to
and from us may be monitored. If the content is not about the
business of the Sword Group then the message is neither from nor
sanctioned by us.
Internet communications are not secure. You should scan this
message and any attachments for viruses. Under no circumstances
do we accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from
your receipt of this email or any attachment.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Received on 2010-09-16 14:05:55 CEST